where are AMERICAN ideas?

yet another entry on the topic of healthcare in this country. i watched the healthcare summit that was conducted between the dems/president and the repubs about two weeks ago. we heard a lot of talk that day and the days after about all the "ideas" in the legislation: obama's, democratic, republican. but i've yet to hear one word about any AMERICAN ideas in the legislation. yes, the republicans showed up with the ever-present line that "the american people want us to scrap this bill and start over," but that wasn't an idea. and quite frankly, starting over doesn't seem very likely to produce real results in this decade if it is what's done.

also, rep. alexander recommended we do it in small steps because "the federal government just doesn't do big well." that may be true, but if we do it in small steps and still end up with the same end result, we only succeeded in spreading out a process that could've been done at once. beyond that, healthcare reform is kind of like a three-legged stool in that it needs to be done at once to stand or else it'll fall over.

tax sugars

hmm, sounds a bit weird to say that. but sugars really need to be taxed, maybe even on par with tobacco. the american heart association just issued guidelines on how much sugar one should consume every day which are much lower than many people (myself included) usually consume. but it would be nice if congress were to act proactively instead of reacting to what has happened for once. in this case, the what has happened is the expanding american waistline. however, since it is still expanding, congress acting now would slow that expansion. the current debate in congress over healthcare actually is much more intricately linked with this idea than might initially appear. as the waistline expands, health problems increase accordingly as well which equal more expense. currently, there is much concern over the plan costing maybe $1 trillion over ten years. which really isn't bad. however, if more attention is brought to the effects of sugar, people's future medical costs could be lowered as they avoid sugar-related medical expenses. sounds weird to be saying that, but any good medical professional will tell you that they definitely exist. beyond that, tax revenues could also be used to fund any healthcare proposals. also, funding in this manner will more evenly spread the cost of reform instead of only taxing the top earners in the country.
anyway, just a couple of my thoughts on this matter. comments are welcome, questions are as well.